|
Web Sites | The Law | Books |
Periodicals and Newspapers
| Connecticut Documents
The
Sheff v. O'Neill lawsuit was filed fourteen years ago, when plaintiff Milo
Sheff was in the fourth grade. On January 22, 2003, the parties involved agreed on a four-year plan, which
the General Assembly approved on February 25th. In
1989, Milo was a student in the Hartford school system, but the issues raised
in the case –segregation, racial and ethnic isolation, and the quality of
education in urban schools – apply to the entire state. What progress has
been made? What is the plan until 2007? Following is a list of print and
electronic resources for those interested in Sheff v. O'Neill, equal
educational opportunity, and school finance.
-
American
Civil Liberties Union
The American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU) describes itself as the "nation's guardian of liberty,
working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve
the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country
by the Constitution and laws of the United States."
The ACLU, employing
educational equity litigation as a strategy for achieving educational reform,
is involved in the
Sheff v. O'Neill case.
The
Connecticut
Civil Liberties Union,
located at 32 Grand
Street in Hartford, is an ACLU affiliate.
Sheff Plaintiffs To
Court
Before
a Connecticut
Superior Court, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF),
the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Connecticut and cooperating
attorneys argued that the state of Connecticut must honor its legal
obligations to desegregate Greater Hartford’s public. The hearings were
videotaped by Connecticut Network. Check the schedule at
http://www.ctn.state.ct.us/daily_schedule.asp. Read the plaintiff’s
filing:
Motion
to Enforce Judgment. Read Sheff’s recent op-ed piece on the suit:
Segregation Has To End
Trinity College (Cities,
Suburbs & Schools Research Project)
In 2007 Trinity College published a
demographic
study of racial diversity in Greater Hartford:
http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/css/Sheff2007.html
PRRAC is assisting the Sheff Movement Coalition in the Project
Choice Campaign, a community outreach effort design to give parents and
children participating in the interdistrict desegregation programs in the
Hartford region a stronger and more consistent voice in the public discourse
about the future of these important programs.
Improving and Expanding Hartford's Project Choice Program Final Report 2007
Connecticut
State Library
This is "a checklist of
materials in the collection of the Connecticut State Library dealing with
integration in Connecticut public schools and related background information,
with special reference to the Sheff v. O'Neill litigation."
Connecticut State Department of Education
Bureau
of Choice Programs
- This is the main page
for the Bureau of Equity and Choice, part of the Connecticut State Department
of Education. The document, "Public School Choice in Connecticut
2007-2008: A Guide for
Students and Their Families" is available
in English and
in Spanish.
Sheff Movement
The objective of the Sheff Movement Website
is to inform interested persons on the progress and challenges to date of
implementing educational remedies to reduce racial and economic isolation
and improve the quality of education in Hartford public schools.
Top of Page
Sheff
v. O'Neill (HTML)
This is the text of the 1996 Connecticut Supreme Court decision.
Sheff v. O'neill Settlement (revised) Jan.27, 2003.
Attorney
General's Press Release
This is the text of the
press release issued by Attorney General Richard Blumenthal following the 1996
Connecticut Supreme Court decision.
Sheff v. O'Neill decision and concurring and dissenting
opinions /
D'Ann
Mazzocca
Hartford, CT :
Connecticut General Assembly, Office of Legislative Research, [1996]
It
is available as a Connecticut Document at the Connecticut State
Library
L55 resa 96-R 1027
This is a summary of the state Supreme Court's Sheff v. O'Neill majority
decision, the concurring opinion, and the minority's dissent written at the
Office of Legislative Research.
Public
Act No. 97-290
"An Act Enhancing
Educational Choices And Opportunities" took effect July 1, 1997 – "…in order
to reduce racial, ethnic and economic isolation, each school district shall
provide educational opportunities for its students to interact with students
and teachers from other racial, ethnic, and economic backgrounds and may
provide such opportunities with students from other communities…"
Sheff
v. O'Neill Memorandum of Decision
(1999) In March 1998, the
plaintiffs went back to court to argue that the State of Connecticut had "not
done enough fast enough" to address the racial imbalance in Hartford schools.
This is the text of the 1999 Supreme Court decision on that contention.
Top of Page
 |
Balkin, Jack M., ed.
What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said… New York: New York
University Press, 2001. (KF 228 .B76 W48 2001) |
 |
Bardige, Betty Lynn Segal.
At a loss for words : how America is failing our children
and what we can do about it . Philadelphia: Temple
Unieversity Press. 2005. (LB1139.L3 B363
2005 Central, Dwight stacks) |
 |
Bell,
Derrick.
Silent covenants : Brown v. Board of Education and the
unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2004. (KF4155 .B38 2004
Central, Albany, Barbour, Ropkins Stacks)
|
 |
Clotfelter,
Charles T.
After Brown - The Rise and Retreat of School Desegregation.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. (On
Order) |
 |
Corwin, Miles.
And Still We Rise: the Trials and Triumphs of Twelve Gifted Inner-City High
School Students. New York: W. Morrow, 2000. (LC 3993.9 .C678 2000
Albany, Camp Field, Mark Twain, and Ropkins stacks) |
 |
Frankenberg, Erica.
Lessons in Integration: Realizing the Promise of Racial
Diversity in American Schools. Charlottesville:
University Press of Virginia, 2007. (On Order)
|
 |
Hale, Janice E.
Learning While Black: Creating Educational Excellence for African American
Children. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 2001. (LC 2771 .H35 2001
Albany stacks)
|
 |
Irons,
Peter.
May it please the court: courts, kids, and the Constitution.
New York: New Press, 2000 (KF4770 .M35 2000 Blue
Hills, Ropkins stacks) |
 |
Patterson, James T.
Brown v. Board of Education: a Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2001. (KF 4155 .P38 2001 Albany stacks) |
 |
Peebles, Robert W.
School Desegregation: A Shattered Dream?.
New York: Vantage Press, 2007. (On Order)
|
Top of Page
The Hartford Public
Library offers electronic access to articles through its
iConn database service
for patrons of Connecticut libraries. You will need your library card to log
into the database.
from the local press:
The
Hartford Courant
has published numerous articles about Sheff v. O'Neill. Some of them appear
in a brief
archive
on the newspaper's Website.
The Hartford Advocate
has published numerous articles of Sheff
v. O'Neill.
Some of them appear in a brief
archive
on the newspaper's Website.
The
Hartford
Business Journal
has published numerous articles of Sheff v. O'Neill.
Some of them appear in a brief
archive
on the newspaper's Website.
To locate additional articles from 1991 to date, search The Hartford
Courant database in
iCONN, the Connecticut Digital Library. To locate earlier articles,
contact the Library.
from journals:
"City Schools Fail to Meet Sheff Goals (Sheff v.
O'Neill case)." Connecticut Law Tribune (June 18, 2007)
"City's Motion to Intervene in Sheff
v. O'Neill Granted."
Connecticut Law Tribune (January 22, 2007)
Holmes, Gloria Graves "To
choose or not to choose: Equity in Connecticut in the wake of Sheff v.
O'Neill." Equity & Excellence in
Education 38.1 (February 2005): p3-13
Margolis,
Emanuel "Every
passing day...(equal education opportunity) (Revisiting Brown v. Board of
Education: 50 Years of Legal and Social Debate)."
Cornell Law Review 90.2 (January
2005): p371-389.
Gooch, James K. "Fenced
in: why Sheff v. O'Neill can't save Connecticut's inner city students."
QLR 22.3 (Winter
2004): p395-453.
Enrich, Peter D. "Race
and money, courts and schools: tentative lessons from Connecticut."
Indiana Law Review 36.3 (Summer
2003): p523-559.
Top of Page
Connecticut.
State Board of Education.
Enhancing Educational Opportunities and Achievement,
[part 1]. [Hartford]: State of Connecticut, State Board of Education, 1998.
(LC 213.22 .C6 C678 1998 Reference)
Connecticut. State
Board of Education.
Interdistrict Magnet Schools and Charter Schools Report.
[Hartford]: State of Connecticut, State Board of Education, 1999. (LB 2806.36
.I5 C8 1998 Oversize)
Connecticut. State Department of Education.
Working Together for Higher Student Achievement in Hartford's Schools…
[Hartford]: State Department of Education, 1996. (LA 251.H3 C65 1996
Reference)
Top of Page
|